The best Pendo alternatives & competitors, compared
Contents
Pendo is a popular product experience platform — and a good one. Its combination of in-app guides, product analytics, feedback collection, and roadmap tools has made it a go-to for product managers looking to drive adoption without engineering support.
But Pendo isn't the right fit for every team. Maybe you need feature flags, A/B testing, or error tracking that Pendo doesn't offer. Maybe you want transparent, usage-based pricing instead of opaque quotes that average ~$48k/year. Or maybe you're an engineering-led team that wants SQL access, open-source code, and a platform that goes beyond in-app guides.
In this guide, we compare the best Pendo alternatives — from all-in-one platforms that combine analytics with experimentation and developer tools, to focused digital adoption platforms for enterprise onboarding.
1. PostHog
- Founded: 2020
- Most similar to: Heap, Pendo, Smartlook
- Typical users: Engineers, product, and growth teams
- Typical customers: Mid-size product-focused B2Bs and startups

What is PostHog?
PostHog (that's us 👋) is a developer platform combining product analytics, session replay, user surveys, feature flags, A/B testing, error tracking, workflows, and more all-in-one. This means it's not just an alternative to Pendo, but also tools like LaunchDarkly and Amplitude.
Typical PostHog users are engineers, founders, and product managers at startups and mid-size companies, particularly B2B companies. Customers include Supabase, Lovable, ElevenLabs, and many more.
Key features
Product analytics: Funnels, user paths, retention analysis, custom trends, and dynamic user cohorts. Also supports SQL insights for power users.
Surveys: Target surveys by event or person properties. Templates for net promoter score (NPS), product-market fit (PMF) surveys, and more.
Session replays: Including event timelines, console logs, network activity, and 90-day data retention.
A/B tests: Up to 9 test variations, primary and secondary metrics. Automatically calculate test duration, sample size, and statistical significance.
Feature flags: Rollout features safely with local evaluation (for faster performance) and JSON payloads.
Workflows: Automate messaging based on user behavior — trigger emails, Slack messages, or webhooks when users complete (or don't complete) key actions.
How does PostHog compare to Pendo?
Both PostHog and Pendo are multi-product companies covering many use cases. Pendo focuses on in-app guides and internal tools. PostHog focuses on tools product and engineering teams need like feature flags, error tracking, and A/B testing.
Main differences between PostHog and Pendo
- PostHog includes feature flags, A/B testing, and experiments natively; Pendo doesn't offer any of these.
- PostHog includes error tracking and developer-focused LLM analytics (traces, costs, latency); Pendo offers Agent Analytics for measuring AI agent adoption and user success, but has no error tracking.
- Pendo has a visual drag-and-drop editor for tooltips, product tours, and onboarding walkthroughs; PostHog doesn't have in-app guide tooling yet (product tours are currently in alpha).
- Pendo includes product validation, roadmap planning, and feedback collection (via Pendo Listen); PostHog covers feedback through surveys and automated messaging through Workflows.
- PostHog supports SQL access for custom queries; Pendo does not.
- Pendo includes session replay only on Core plans and above; PostHog includes replay on all plans including free.
Main similarities between PostHog and Pendo
- Both offer product analytics with funnels, trends, retention analysis, and user paths.
- Both support event autocapture to start collecting data without manual instrumentation.
- Both include surveys for collecting in-app feedback and NPS scores.
- Both offer EU hosting and are SOC 2 certified, GDPR-ready, and HIPAA-ready.
- Both support group analytics for account-level analysis in B2B products.
- Both have web and mobile SDKs with support for major platforms.
Why do companies use PostHog?
According to reviews on G2, companies use PostHog because:
It replaces multiple tools: PostHog replaces Mixpanel (analytics), Statsig (feature flags and A/B testing), and Pendo (feedback and surveys). This simplifies workflows and ensures all their data is in one place.
Pricing is transparent and scalable: Reviewers appreciate how PostHog's pricing scales as their company (and usage) grows. There's a generous free tier. Companies eligible for PostHog for Startups also get $50k in additional free credits.
They need a complete picture of users: PostHog includes the necessary tools to understand users and improve products. This means creating funnels to track conversion, watching replays to see where users get stuck, testing solutions with A/B/n tests, and gathering feedback with user surveys.
Bottom line
For teams looking for all the features of Pendo minus in-app guidance, PostHog makes a great alternative. Being free, self-serve, and open source makes it easy to explore and try out. PostHog is especially good for engineering-focused startups and scale-ups looking for tools for build a great product.
2. Whatfix
- Founded: 2014
- Most similar to: WalkMe, Appcues
- Typical users: Enterprise healthcare, financial services, and HR companies
- Typical customers: Education and training teams, HR

What is Whatfix?
Whatfix is a digital adoption and product analytics platform built for enterprises. It has guidance, feedback, and content tools to help with transformation, training, and onboarding. Teams can create and manage content, deliver it to specific users in-app, and measure its impact.
Whatfix also includes personalizations, automation, and integrations to help optimize your workflows and app.
Key features
Guidance: Add interactive in-app guidance, contextual support, and announcements to your app easily.
Product analytics: Autocapture user behavior and analyze with trend, funnel, and retention graphs.
Content management: Create and manage support content like e-learning materials and product announcements, no coding required.
In-app messaging: Make announcements, drive adoption of new features, and help users when they get stuck.
Surveys: Collect feedback and NPS responses through in-app surveys.
How does Whatfix compare to Pendo?
While Pendo focuses both on internal and external use cases, Whatfix focuses primarily on internal use cases (helping employees learn and use enterprise software). It recently added more tools like session replay, which is available as separately priced add-on.
Main differences between Whatfix and Pendo
- Whatfix focuses primarily on internal employee adoption; Pendo focuses on external product experience for end users.
- Whatfix includes sandbox training environments (Whatfix Mirror) and LMS integrations; Pendo has no training or simulation features.
- Pendo includes session replay on Core plans and above; Whatfix offers session replay only through its separately priced Product Analytics add-on.
- Pendo includes native NPS surveys and feedback collection (Pendo Listen); Whatfix has basic in-app surveys but no equivalent feedback loop.
- Whatfix has deeper enterprise integrations with Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow; Pendo integrates with product and analytics tools.
Main similarities between Whatfix and Pendo
- Both offer in-app guides, tooltips, and onboarding walkthroughs with no-code editors.
- Both include product analytics with trends, funnels, and retention analysis.
- Both support event autocapture for tracking user behavior.
- Both require sales conversations for pricing — neither publishes transparent pricing.
- Both are closed-source, cloud-only platforms.
Why do companies use Whatfix?
Looking at G2 reviews, users are fans of the following features of Whatfix:
Easy guidance tools: Whatfix enables teams to easily drive product adoption through onboarding flows, tooltips, and widgets. All of which reviewers find they can use from the start.
Help managing complexity: Reviewers often mention using Whatfix on their complicated pages. It helps them effectively guide users on these pages and adapts well to complex sites.
Support: Whatfix provides a collaborative, responsive support team. Reviewers appreciate that this helps them get a solution tailored to their needs.
Bottom line
Whatfix is a solid alternative for teams looking for internal analytics and user guidance, but doesn't have a free tier or self-serve. Teams looking to interact with or understand external users or avoid a sales process should look elsewhere though.
3. Hotjar
- Founded: 2014
- Most similar to: Pendo, PostHog
- Typical users: Product designers, researchers, and marketers
- Typical customers: Ecommerce and content-driven sites

What is Hotjar?
Hotjar (now part of Contentsquare) is a tool for understanding user behavior. It provides heatmaps, replays, feedback, and interviews to capture and display the qualitative aspects of your site and app. Teams use it to discover and address pain points on their site and app, which helps them improve customer experiences.
Key features
Heatmaps: See what parts of your pages get attention and how far down the page users get.
Recordings: Replay real user sessions and see what they see; discover hidden friction.
Feedback: Learn what your users are thinking. Find out their likes, dislikes, and satisfaction.
Surveys: Ask users questions to hear their opinions on features, flows, and what you should build next.
Interviews: Talk to real users to share ideas, test designs, and get live feedback.
How does Hotjar compare to Pendo?
Hotjar has a similar focus to Pendo, helping users create better digital experiences. Hotjar tools on tools for capturing and displaying qualitative data. It doesn't have the product adoption or the quantitative analytics features of Pendo.
Main differences between Hotjar and Pendo
- Hotjar focuses on qualitative insights (heatmaps, recordings, feedback); Pendo focuses on product adoption and quantitative analytics.
- Pendo includes in-app guides, tooltips, and onboarding flows; Hotjar has no in-app messaging or adoption tooling.
- Pendo includes product analytics with funnels, retention, and cohorts; Hotjar doesn't offer product analytics natively (but it's available on the full Contentsquare platform).
- Hotjar includes heatmaps and user interviews; Pendo offers neither.
Main similarities between Hotjar and Pendo
- Both offer session replay for watching real user sessions.
- Both include surveys for collecting in-app feedback and NPS scores.
- Both are closed-source, cloud-only platforms.
- Both target non-technical users like product managers and designers.
Why do companies use Hotjar?
According to G2 reviews, users are fans of Hotjar because:
Insights on user behavior: Hotjar captures what users are doing, where their attention is going, and how they are spending their time. Users love the insights they get with Hotjar's tools.
Simple for non-technical users: Hotjar is easy to set up. Non-technical roles like designers, marketers, and product managers find it simple to use. The visuals do a good job of making data clear.
Heatmaps and scrollmaps: Seeing clicks and scroll depth down works well and creates actionable insights for design, marketing, and content teams. Helps improve UX and page designs.
Bottom line
Hotjar and Pendo are both tools for building better user experiences. Hotjar does this by capturing qualitative data but misses out on the adoption tools for actually improving those experiences. Still, by being self-serve and free to try, it makes a solid alternative to Pendo.
4. WalkMe
- Founded: 2011
- Most similar to: Whatfix, Appcues
- Typical users: HR, IT, and training teams.
- Typical customers: Enterprises with large staffs like consultancies, healthcare, and sales.

What is WalkMe?
WalkMe (acquired by SAP in 2024) is a leading digital adoption platform that overlays any application. It tracks usage of internal software, automates repetitive tasks, and provides guidance to onboarding or lost users. It is used by sales teams to navigate a CRM like Salesfore, HR teams to onboard with Workday, or support teams to resolve issues with ServiceNow.
Key features
Guidance: Create guidance for workflows that resolve friction. Provide content, notifications, and support at the right time.
Workflows: Automate common tasks, and help employees save time with repetitive tasks.
Integrations: Integrate with Salesforce, Workday, ServiceNow, and more to speed up adoption and automate workflows.
Analytics: Monitor application, workflow, and form analytics to get insights on how employees are using software.
How does WalkMe compare to Pendo?
Like Whatfix, WalkMe focuses on internal analytics and use cases. Its integrations with tools like Salesforce and Workday are particularly strong, but it doesn't have the same external-facing analytics features as Pendo.